Antimatters of Importance
Nov. 21st, 2008 03:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

I'm a bit worried about superstring theory. If physicists haven't yet proved superstrings exist, why are they factoring it into so many of their attempts to find a unified Theory of Everything? What if they find a Theory of Everything that hinges on superstring theory existing, then discover superstrings don't exist? Would the universe fall apart? Would antimatter make a sudden resurgance and collide with matter and render us all to atomic dust?
I'm pretty okay with string theory. Working at a maths institute for over a year has assured me that string theory probably works fine. Superstring theory bothers me know. It depends on there being, like, six other dimensions besides the ones we already know about, and we can't prove they exist. And if they do exist, they're so tightly curled in on each other, we can't find them anyway. I have therefore concluded that superstring theory is not good, and physicists should find an alternative means of explaning the universe.
Listening to the pulse of the Universe'
on 2008-11-21 04:37 pm (UTC)See, clear as mud!
Re: Listening to the pulse of the Universe'
on 2008-11-21 04:47 pm (UTC)Re: Listening to the pulse of the Universe'
on 2008-11-21 05:12 pm (UTC)Hope you have a great weekend, Hon!
Re: Listening to the pulse of the Universe'
on 2008-11-27 12:21 am (UTC)That's quite obvious - you're still sane. Sanity and understanding quantum physics are mutually incompatible.
no subject
on 2008-11-21 05:11 pm (UTC)BBC: Parallel Universes
Enjoy! :)
SCIENCE!
on 2008-11-21 05:37 pm (UTC)I'll have to ask my brother what he thinks about it all.
Re: SCIENCE!
on 2008-11-25 09:41 am (UTC)Re: SCIENCE!
on 2008-11-26 11:04 am (UTC)