Objection!
Feb. 21st, 2011 09:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm tired, so please forgive me if I sound really grumpy, but ... well, I'm about to be really grumpy.
I'm fed up of seeing the endless bitching and pissing over indie v trad publishing, whether indies should refer to themselves as indies, whether self-publishing is valid or vanity, whether traditional publishing is dead, how your an idiot if you want to waste time with agents, how you're a failure if you want to self-publish, how you'll never make it either way because you're one of millions and who's going to pay attention to your crappy book anyway. I'm sick of it.
I'm sick of it because:
1. Nobody has the right to make you feel bad about your choices. Everyone's path is different, everyone's reasons for writing are different. Nobody should be judged for chosing their path and sticking with it.
2. Labels! FFS. If indie authors want to avoid the negative connotations that come with "self-published," who's business is that? Why does it matter? It's a word. It's not an offensive one, so who cares?
3. We're all writers, aren't we? Why does there have to be this divide when we're all essentially doing the same thing: writing a story we care about. Whether we choose to upload it to the Kindle or send it round to agents, why should that create any issues with any other writers?
I'm sorry, but I don't get it. I don't get why one choice is more valid than the other, I don't get why there has to be a competition to see who makes the most money the fastest, and I don't get why people can't feel proud of something they've laboured over for weeks and months - maybe years - just because they chose a different route to you. Indie, trad, self-published, e-published, small press, big six... I don't care. I'm not an indie writer. I'm not a trad writer. I'm not a small press writer. I'm just a writer and I'm bored of all the angst.
I'm fed up of seeing the endless bitching and pissing over indie v trad publishing, whether indies should refer to themselves as indies, whether self-publishing is valid or vanity, whether traditional publishing is dead, how your an idiot if you want to waste time with agents, how you're a failure if you want to self-publish, how you'll never make it either way because you're one of millions and who's going to pay attention to your crappy book anyway. I'm sick of it.
I'm sick of it because:
1. Nobody has the right to make you feel bad about your choices. Everyone's path is different, everyone's reasons for writing are different. Nobody should be judged for chosing their path and sticking with it.
2. Labels! FFS. If indie authors want to avoid the negative connotations that come with "self-published," who's business is that? Why does it matter? It's a word. It's not an offensive one, so who cares?
3. We're all writers, aren't we? Why does there have to be this divide when we're all essentially doing the same thing: writing a story we care about. Whether we choose to upload it to the Kindle or send it round to agents, why should that create any issues with any other writers?
I'm sorry, but I don't get it. I don't get why one choice is more valid than the other, I don't get why there has to be a competition to see who makes the most money the fastest, and I don't get why people can't feel proud of something they've laboured over for weeks and months - maybe years - just because they chose a different route to you. Indie, trad, self-published, e-published, small press, big six... I don't care. I'm not an indie writer. I'm not a trad writer. I'm not a small press writer. I'm just a writer and I'm bored of all the angst.
no subject
on 2011-02-21 09:56 am (UTC)In the end, we're all writers. It doesn't -- or it shouldn't -- matter what publisher has bought our work, or what agents reps us. Our job is to write stuff we're passionate about and what to share with people.
[Sorry if this seems ranty, your post just got me thinking]
:) xx
no subject
on 2011-02-21 09:59 am (UTC)Our job is to write stuff we're passionate about and what to share with people
This is the bottom line for me, and it's taken me years to actually realise that, as stupid as that sounds. I'm not denying I don't still dream of seeing my books in Waterstones or Borders (maybe not Borders, now...), but what I've realised this past year is that what's really important to me is sharing my work with readers and having them enjoy it.
And actually, I'm a lot happier with my writing now I'm not putting pressure on myself to chase agents and publishers every second of the day too!
no subject
on 2011-02-21 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-21 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-21 12:55 pm (UTC)But then, my success rate with publishers (or rather publications) I respect is 0% as yet, so perhaps I need to admit I'm only good enough for the lowest common denominator.
no subject
on 2011-02-21 03:13 pm (UTC)On the other hand, my experiences with Queered Fiction have been stellar, and Damnation Books, whilst I have some reservations about certain things, have been great to work with too. Same with indie books - so far I've found more good than bad, but I guess the argument there is: I know what I like to read, I don't read much outside my chosen genre, so I'm likely to find what I want without much vetting beforehand.
And the other point is... there are some godawful tradiationally published books out there too!
no subject
on 2011-02-21 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-21 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-21 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-21 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-22 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-22 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-22 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
on 2011-02-22 04:55 pm (UTC)