on 2011-03-23 11:35 pm (UTC)
Okay, I need to clarify my comments. I think. I think Verdan's response was awesome because she could have thrown a tantrum, spewed a load of bile all over the internet and, like one particular idiot I saw on Twitter, called for Trisha's death. Instead she wrote what I feel to be a dignified response to a potentially damaging situation. There have been a lot of author-behaving-badly stories on the net lately; it's nice that this wasn't one. I admire her sticking to a principle she believes in and for putting a positive message out there.

I'm not suggesting that not publishing a gay story is a crime or evil. I'm a bit puzzled as to where that came from. What I am saying is that excluding a story for having gay content is offensive to me, the same way that changing the cover of a book featuring an African-American narrator to show a white person is offensive. Of course people.don't have to read a story with gay content if it doesn't appeal to them, the same way I don't have to read space opera or military history. But I think it would be nice if the choice were there, rather than being made for me by an editor, whatever her intention was.

For what it's worth, I don't think Trisha is homophobic for a second. I think she made a poor judgement call and compounded the problem with a flippant apology. I'm sure she doesn't need me to defend her though.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

naomi_jay: (Default)
Dirty Little Whirlwind

February 2018

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 02:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios